CURRENT-AFFAIRS

Read Current Affairs

​​​​​​

  • The Supreme Court has recently instructed a supervisory committee, led by the head of the National Dam Safety Authority (NDSA), to address the concerns raised by Tamil Nadu regarding Kerala's handling of the maintenance of the 125-year-old Mullaperiyar dam.
  • About the National Dam Safety Authority (NDSA):
    • The NDSA is a statutory body established by the Central Government under Section 8(1) of the National Dam Safety Act, 2021.
  • Functions:
    • The NDSA is responsible for regulating, overseeing, and inspecting dams across India.
    • It plays a pivotal role in developing policies and guidelines for the construction, upkeep, and operation of dams throughout the country.
    • A significant responsibility of the NDSA is to resolve disputes between State Dam Safety Organizations or between a State organization and a dam owner within the state.
    • The NDSA also runs national awareness campaigns to educate the public on dam safety.
    • In the event of natural disasters or emergencies, the authority ensures that emergency response plans are in place.
    • The NDSA is headed by a chairman and supported by five members who lead its various wings: policy and research, technical, regulation, disaster resilience, and administration and finance.
    • Its headquarters is located in New Delhi.

​​​​​​

  • Why in News?
    • At ICDRI 2025, India spotlighted five global priorities: embedding disaster resilience in education, launching a global digital disaster data platform, enabling innovative finance for developing countries, recognizing SIDS as Large Ocean Nations, and boosting early warning capabilities.
  • Key Provisions:-
    • A major highlight was the “Call to Action for Coastal Resilience in SIDS,” proposing ten strategic initiatives such as SIDS Global Data Hub 2.0, universal multi-hazard early warning by 2030, and establishing finance ministry-based resilience units.
    • The conference—held for the first time in Europe, in Nice—emphasized unified investment strategies and policy coherence to ensure scalable climate-resilient infrastructure.
    • Hosted under CDRI, a global coalition initiated by India, the forum is a key platform to drive climate adaptation and resilience in infrastructure.
    • With an ambitious goal to catalyze US$10 trillion in resilient infrastructure investments by 2050, CDRI plays a vital role in supporting vulnerable coastal communities worldwide.

​​​​​​

  • Why in News?
    • The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) will lead a comprehensive investigation into the recent Air India aircraft crash at Ahmedabad airport. The incident has triggered a formal probe to determine its cause and ensure accountability.
  • Key Provisions:-
    • Established in 2012, the AAIB functions as an attached office under the Ministry of Civil Aviation. Its formation aligns with India’s commitment to Annex 13 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation (1944), which outlines international standards for aircraft accident investigations.
    • The bureau's primary role is to oversee investigations and support legal processes under the Aircraft (Investigation of Accidents and Incidents) Rules, 2017. It specifically investigates all accidents and serious incidents involving aircraft with an All-up Weight (AUW) over 2,250 kg or turbojet aircraft.
    • By ensuring independent and objective inquiries, the AAIB plays a key role in improving aviation safety standards and preventing the recurrence of similar incidents.

​​​​​​

  • Why in News?
    • The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) will lead a comprehensive investigation into the recent Air India aircraft crash at Ahmedabad airport. The incident has triggered a formal probe to determine its cause and ensure accountability.
  • Key Provisions:-
    • Established in 2012, the AAIB functions as an attached office under the Ministry of Civil Aviation. Its formation aligns with India’s commitment to Annex 13 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation (1944), which outlines international standards for aircraft accident investigations.
    • The bureau's primary role is to oversee investigations and support legal processes under the Aircraft (Investigation of Accidents and Incidents) Rules, 2017. It specifically investigates all accidents and serious incidents involving aircraft with an All-up Weight (AUW) over 2,250 kg or turbojet aircraft.
    • By ensuring independent and objective inquiries, the AAIB plays a key role in improving aviation safety standards and preventing the recurrence of similar incidents.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  • Why in News?
    • The Union Minister of Jal Shakti has inaugurated C-FLOOD, a new integrated flood forecasting platform designed to support disaster management efforts.
  • Key Provisions:-
    • This web-based system delivers village-level flood inundation forecasts two days in advance, using advanced 2-D hydrodynamic modelling. C-FLOOD brings together flood data from various national and regional agencies, offering unified predictions and real-time hazard mapping.
    • Approximately 40 million hectares—12% of India's land area—are flood-prone. C-FLOOD addresses this challenge by offering timely flood maps and water level forecasts to aid authorities in preparedness and response.
    • C-FLOOD was jointly developed by C-DAC Pune, the Central Water Commission, the Department of Water Resources, and the National Remote Sensing Centre. It is executed under the National Supercomputing Mission (NSM), a joint initiative by MeitY and DST launched in 2015.
    • Currently covering the Mahanadi, Godavari, and Tapi river basins, the system will soon expand nationwide and integrate with the National Disaster Management Emergency Response Portal (NDEM).

​​​​​

  • Why in News?
    • A powerful earthquake struck Afghanistan on September 1, 2025, killing over 1,400 and injuring at least 3,100. The U.S. Geological Survey reported the primary 6.3 magnitude quake near Jalalabad, Nangarhar province, at a depth of eight kilometres, followed by a 4.7 magnitude aftershock. Rescue efforts in Kunar and Nangarhar are hindered by limited resources and sanctions on the Taliban regime. The UN and aid agencies have pledged support.
  • Key Provisions:-
    • Afghanistan, lying at the meeting point of the Indian and Eurasian tectonic plates, remains highly quake-prone. Since 1900, the northeast has seen 12 quakes above magnitude 7. Comparisons with Chile, which suffers similar magnitudes but minimal casualties due to strict building codes, underline Afghanistan’s vulnerability. The October 2023 Herat quake, also 6.3 magnitude, killed over 1,500 and damaged 63,000 homes. Earthquakes need not be fatal; Afghanistan must urgently adopt and enforce robust building standards alongside public awareness measures.

​​​​​​

  • Why in News?
    • At a meeting with the 16th Finance Commission, the Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister emphasized the need to revise the Disaster Risk Index (DRI) to better reflect the state’s unique vulnerabilities. The demand highlights the importance of accurate assessment tools for equitable resource allocation in disaster-prone regions.
  • About Disaster Risk Index (DRI)
    • The DRI was developed by the 15th Finance Commission to introduce objectivity into fiscal transfers by accounting for disaster risks faced by different states. It evaluates 14 hazards, 14 vulnerabilities, and 2 exposure parameters. Hazards include earthquakes, cyclones, floods, and droughts, while vulnerabilities consider factors such as the rural and urban poor, women, and children. Exposure is measured using population and GDP indicators.
    • By integrating these dimensions, the index helps guide resource distribution, strengthen preparedness, and ensure that states with higher risks receive adequate financial support.

General Studies Paper – III: Technology, Economic Development, Biodiversity, Environment, Security and Disaster Management


Context

Electricity-related accidents are not new to India. Over the past two decades, states such as Kerala, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh have reported numerous tragic fatalities caused by naked wires, worn-out poles, and poor maintenance. During the monsoon season, electrocution incidents have consistently remained high. In industrial regions, equipment failures and, in rural areas, deteriorated distribution lines have long increased safety risks. In this continuity, the incidents of 1 December 2025 in Hardoi and Khargone once again underline this structural problem. These accidents have intensified the question of whether public safety can be ensured without sustained infrastructure investment, regular inspections, and strict adherence to safety standards.


Electricity-Related Fatality

An electricity-related fatality is a death caused by direct electric shock, electrical arc/short-circuit, malfunction of electrical equipment, accidents related to distribution lines, or fire/explosion resulting from these. Such incidents can occur in domestic, industrial, agricultural as well as public power distribution systems.


Why in Discussion?

  • In different parts of the country, tragic electricity-related incidents have been reported. The death of a labourer due to electrocution in Panchampurwa village of Hardoi (U.P.), and the death of two individuals in Khargone (M.P.) after a tractor-trolley carrying electric poles overturned, reflect that electrical safety in India continues to be a serious concern.
  • These incidents highlight significant gaps in electrical infrastructure safety and operational practices in both rural and urban areas. The issue is significant because it intersects with public safety, administrative accountability, infrastructure quality, and human rights.


Major Causes of Accidents

  • Lack of safety awareness and training: Safety standards are often ignored while working near electrical equipment, wires, or distribution lines.
  • Dilapidated and inadequate electrical infrastructure: Naked wires, loose poles, poor insulation, and old distribution networks increase accident risks.
  • Insufficient maintenance and load management issues: Overloaded transformers, line faults, and inadequate maintenance are major contributors.
  • Negligence in transport and construction sites: Safety norms are frequently ignored during the transport of poles/electrical materials.
  • Weak legal enforcement: Post-accident investigations, punitive actions and accountability mechanisms are often slow and incomplete.


Government Initiatives

  • Ministry of Power and Central Electricity Authority (CEA): Issuing electrical safety guidelines, safety manuals, awareness campaigns, and observing “Electrical Safety Day.”
  • DISCOM-level reforms: Many states are strengthening distribution lines, installing fault-circuit breakers and improving overload management.
  • Regulatory framework: Electricity Rules, Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) norms, and CEA regulations provide detailed safety standards, though their implementation remains inconsistent.


Role of Human Rights Institutions & NGOs

  • At the national level: National Safety Council (NSC) and other bodies conduct training programmes, workshops, and community campaigns on electrical safety.
  • At the international level: ESFI, NFPA, and OSHA set high-quality electrical safety standards which guide many countries, including India.
  • NGOs and human rights groups: Advocate compensation for victims, demand timely investigation, and push for safer working conditions.


Constitution and Human Rights

Article 21 of the Indian Constitution—“Right to life and personal liberty”—obligates the State to ensure the safety of every citizen. If deaths occur due to negligence or failure to maintain electrical infrastructure, it raises serious questions within the constitutional framework of life protection. The judiciary has repeatedly emphasized that a safe and dignified life is an essential component of Article 21.


Global Scenario

Several countries strictly regulate electrical safety through stringent standards and enforcement mechanisms. In the USA, UK, and Australia, OSHA and NFPA standards are mandatory. Although electrification accidents do occur in developed countries, continuous monitoring, technological modernization, and higher public awareness significantly reduce fatality rates.


Analysis

In the Indian context, the problem is not merely technological but also administrative, social, and structural. Despite the presence of safety norms, compliance remains inconsistent. Rural infrastructure is outdated, and in urban areas, rapid expansion has burdened distribution networks. Effective solutions require policymakers to prioritise a three-tier framework: data-based planning, strict enforcement, and public awareness.


Way Forward

  • Strict enforcement and regular safety audits: CEA and state DISCOMs must ensure regular inspection of infrastructure and priority-based repair in high-risk areas.
  • Expansion of public awareness and training: Mandatory safety programmes in schools, panchayats, construction sites, and agricultural areas.
  • Safe transport standards: Strict technical norms and licensing for transporting poles, wires, and heavy electrical equipment.
  • Fast and transparent accountability: Timely investigation, responsibility determination and time-bound punitive action in accident cases.
  • Improved data collection: Strengthening national databases on electrical accidents to enable evidence-based policymaking.


Conclusion

Electricity-related fatalities are not merely technical or mechanical issues; they are deeply connected with human life, administrative responsibility, and constitutional values. The incidents of 1 December 2025 remind us that modernization of infrastructure, strict compliance with safety standards, public awareness, and transparent accountability are essential to prevent such tragedies in the future.

General Studies Paper – III: Technology, Economic Development, Bio-diversity, Environment, Security and Disaster Management.


Context

India's geographical location makes it vulnerable to various natural disasters. Coastal states, particularly Odisha, stand at the front line of 'climate change'. Recently, the 16th Finance Commission has presented a new approach for the distribution of disaster funds. However, this new framework creates a serious paradox: on one hand, Odisha’s model of disaster management is appreciated globally, while on the other hand, in the new financial allocation, this very state is suffering the most significant loss.

Disaster Risk: Legal and Scientific Definition

Under the Disaster Management Act, 2005, a disaster is defined as a catastrophe occurring in an area that is beyond human capacity to manage. But disaster 'risk', according to the modern scientific framework (per the IPCC’s 6th Report), is measured on three pillars:

  1. Hazard: Intensity of the natural event (such as a cyclone or earthquake).
  2. Exposure: The population and property present in the path of the hazard.
  3. Vulnerability: The inability to withstand a disaster (economic and social factors).

Why in News?

The 16th Finance Commission has allocated ₹2,04,401 crore for the State Disaster Response Fund (SDRF) (a 59.5% increase from the 15th Commission). Despite this, the main cause of controversy is the new 'multiplicative formula' of the Disaster Risk Index (DRI):

  • Odisha’s Loss: There has been a sharp decline of 1.57 percentage points in Odisha’s share of disaster funds, which is the highest among all 28 states.
  • Inequality: The share of 20 states has decreased. The shocking fact is that even though Odisha has the highest 'Hazard Score' (12) in the country, it is receiving less funding.

The 16th Finance Commission’s New Formula: Structural Problem

The Commission has used the formula 'Disaster Risk Index (DRI) = Hazard X Exposure X Vulnerability'. The problem lies not in the theory, but in its parameters:

  • Error in Exposure: The Commission has measured 'Exposure' based on the state’s total population (on a scale of 1 to 25).
    • Logic: UP received 25 and Sikkim received 1.
    • Error: Scientifically, 'Exposure' means the population living in the disaster-prone area. The risk to a population of 10 crore living on a safe plateau is less than that of 3 crore people settled along a cyclone-prone coastline.
  • Narrowness of Vulnerability: This has been measured by the inverse of the per capita Net State Domestic Product (NSDP).
    • Error: This measures only 'fiscal capacity', not 'disaster vulnerability'. Vulnerability means the lack of proper housing (kutcha houses), poor health infrastructure, and a lack of warning systems, not just low income.

Odisha and Other States

State

Hazard Score

Population Score

DRI (Result)

Analysis

Odisha

12 (Highest)

5

79.8

Despite high risk, funding decreased due to low population.

Uttar Pradesh

Low

25 (High)

413.2

Most benefited due to massive population.

Bihar

Medium

High

224.2

Higher allocation despite lower risk.

Kerala

Medium

4

34.5

Received low vulnerability score (1.073) due to high per capita income, reducing funds.

Odisha: A Global Model of Disaster Management

Odisha has developed a 'Zero Casualty' model through investment over the last two decades:

  • Investment: Early warning systems, multipurpose cyclone shelters, and community participation.
  • Paradox: The state that made the deepest investment in disaster preparedness is receiving a financial 'penalty' instead of a 'reward'.

Constitutional and Legal Provisions

  • Article 280: Gives the Finance Commission the power for the equitable distribution of resources.
  • Seventh Schedule: Disaster management is not formally in any list, but it is the responsibility of both the Centre and the States through residual powers and the Concurrent List.
  • Act of 2005: This sets the statutory mandate for the proper management of financial resources (State Disaster Response Fund/National Disaster Response Fund).

Necessary Changes: Suggestions for Reform

According to experts, the following improvements should be made to the formula:

  • Population Data: Instead of total population, the population of 'risk zones' should be counted using the BMTPC Vulnerability Atlas and Census block data.
  • Multidimensional Index: Data from NFHS-5, PM-Fasal Bima Yojana, and NHM should be used to measure vulnerability (e.g., % of kutcha houses, agricultural dependence).
  • Institutional Standardization: The NDMA should be statutorily mandated to issue an annual 'State Disaster Vulnerability Index'.

Analysis: 'Risk vs. Population'

The current formula has become a 'population headcount' rather than a 'risk index'. It discourages states that:

  • Have succeeded in population control.
  • Are trying to reduce their 'vulnerability' through economic progress.

If a cyclone hits Odisha, the need for disaster relief depends on the affected 'coastal population', not the 'total population' of the state. The 16th Finance Commission’s current model ignores this fundamental scientific truth.

Way Forward

  • Scientific Measurement: Funding should be removed from politics and administrative convenience and based on scientific data (like IMD and disaster atlases).
  • Climate Resilience: Future climate projections should be included in fund allocation because the frequency of disasters in states like Odisha, Kerala, and Assam is set to increase.

Conclusion:

It is imperative for India to prioritize 'Cooperative Federalism' and 'Fiscal Justice' in disaster financing. The 16th Finance Commission should make 'actual regional risk' and 'structural vulnerability' the basis of allocation instead of just population. A reduction in the security funds of disaster-prone states like Odisha could weaken the 'disaster resilience' developed by them over the years. Therefore, a scientific and risk-based financial framework is the fundamental cornerstone for ensuring the overall security of the nation.