Read Current Affairs
Census 2027: Review of Independent India's First Comprehensive Caste and Digital Census
General Studies Paper – II: Governance, Constitution, Polity, Social Justice, and International Relations.
Context
The Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India (RG&CCI) under the Ministry of Home Affairs, through an official notification, has issued an official notification of 40 questions for the second phase (Population Enumeration) of Census 2027. With this historic initiative, the second phase of work has already commenced in the snow-bound areas of Ladakh, Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand, and Himachal Pradesh.
What is Census?
Census is the entire process of collecting, compiling, analyzing, and publishing demographic, social, and economic data of all persons in a country or a defined territory at a specified time. In India, the Census is conducted under the constitutional provisions through the 'Census Act, 1948' and 'Census Rules, 1990', and it is a subject of the Union List.
Why in Discussion?
Notification of 40 Questions: The number of questions for the second phase of the Census has been increased to 40.
- Caste Census for the First Time in Independent India: Under Question No. 10 "SC/ST/Caste", an open column has been provided for the first time since 1931 for General/OBC categories, in which the caste declared by the respondent will be recorded.
- New Digital and Personal Data Fields: For the first time, details such as digital literacy, COVID-19 vaccination site, number of bank accounts, [Aadhaar Redacted], passport, driving license, and voter ID card have been added.
New Provisions of Census 2027
Conduct in Two Phases:
- House Listing and Housing Operations (April – September 2026).
- Population Enumeration (February 2027; reference date for snow-bound areas is October 1, 2026).
- Digital Census and Self-Enumeration: Respondents can enter data themselves through the "Self-Enumeration" portal, or enumerators will collect data via a mobile app.
- Open Column Data Collection: For caste registration, an open text column has been kept instead of a pre-determined state-wise list.
2011 Census vs 2027 Census
Parameter | 2011 Census | 2027 Census |
Number of Questions | 29 Questions | 40 Questions |
Caste Enumeration | Scheduled Caste (SC) and Scheduled Tribe (ST) only | 'Open Column' for SC, ST, and all other castes |
Medium of Data Collection | Entirely paper-based | Completely digital (Mobile App and Self-Enumeration portal) |
Digital and Identity Data | Not included | [Aadhaar Redacted], bank accounts, digital literacy, and COVID vaccination included |
History and Significance of Census
Historical Background: The first non-synchronous Census in India was conducted in 1872 during the time of Lord Mayo, and the first complete synchronous Census took place in 1881 during Lord Ripon's tenure. The year 1931 was the last Census in which data for all castes were collected.
- Significance:
- Policy Formulation: Accurate mapping of targeted welfare schemes.
- Delimitation and Representation: Basis for future delimitation of Lok Sabha/Assembly seats under constitutional provisions.
- Resource Allocation: Demographic basis for the devolution of taxes among states by the Finance Commission.
Key Concerns
Data Discrepancy from Open Column: In the 2011 Socio-Economic and Caste Census (SECC), the open column led to over 46 lakh names of castes/sub-castes emerging, making data categorization complex.
- Data Privacy and Security: Collection of personal data like [Aadhaar Redacted], passport, and bank accounts carries risks regarding the right to privacy and data breach.
- Lack of Standardization and Authenticity: The absence of a pre-defined list may lead to excessive time spent on analysis and verification of data.
Analysis
Census 2027 is not merely a demographic head-count, but a revolutionary step towards reshaping the socio-economic landscape of India. The integration of digital tools will speed up data processing and minimize human errors. However, the lack of scientific standardization in caste data collection and the privacy challenges arising from collecting identity documents could become major obstacles in its execution.
Way Forward
Data Standardization Software: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based 'Fuzzy Logic' and Natural Language Processing (NLP) should be utilized for processing caste entries obtained in the open column.
- Stringent Data Protection Framework: Strict compliance with the standards of the 'Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act' must be ensured to safeguard data related to personal identity.
- Enumerator Training: Over 30 lakh enumerators should be imparted rigorous training on caste entries and mobile app operations.
Conclusion
Equipped with digital technology and inclusive data fields, Census 2027 will prove to be a historic milestone towards evidence-based policy making in India. If data privacy and accurate standardization of caste data are managed efficiently, this exercise will provide an unprecedented momentum to equitable social development.
NALSAR Controversy: Review of the Right to Express Dissent and BCI's Overreach
General Studies Paper – II: Governance, Constitution, Polity, Social Justice, and International Relations.
Context
In any democracy, the right to freedom of expression and dissent is a core part of fundamental rights. Recently, the Bar Council of India's (BCI) intervention in a matter of dialogue between the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (CJI) and students of a prestigious National Law University of the country has become a subject of discussion regarding constitutional rights and institutional autonomy.
What is BCI?
The Bar Council of India (BCI) is a statutory body constituted under the 'Advocates Act, 1961'. Its primary function is to lay down and regulate the standards of legal profession and legal education in India. It oversees the functions of State Bar Councils and prescribes a professional code of conduct for advocates.
Reason in News
Strict Stance of the Top Court: A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court (headed by the CJI himself) termed the action taken by the BCI against the students of NALSAR as an unwarranted interference.
- Attempt to Stop Enrolment: The BCI issued a letter directing State Bar Councils to stop the enrolment of NALSAR's 2026 batch of students, which was withdrawn following intense criticism.
- Supreme Court's Direction: The court barred the BCI from taking any coercive action against the students or the university administration and sought a clarifying affidavit within two weeks.
What is the Controversy/Issue?
The core dispute began when some students of NALSAR University expressed their disagreement and protest against inviting the Chief Justice to the convocation ceremony. On this, the BCI Chairman wrote a letter to the Vice-Chancellor of the university seeking an inquiry report to identify the people behind the protest and directed a ban on the enrolment of the 2026 batch. This step of the BCI was considered an attack on the fundamental right to freedom of expression of the students and an attempt to create a 'chilling effect'.
About NALSAR
'National Academy of Legal Studies and Research' (NALSAR), located in Hyderabad, Telangana, is one of India's premier National Law Universities (NLUs). It was established in 1998 under a State Act. This university is known for excellence in legal education, research, and fostering independent and analytical thinking among students.
Powers and Limits of BCI
Legal Scope: Under the Advocates Act, 1961, the powers of the BCI are limited to regulating the conduct of registered advocates and the curriculum/standards of legal education.
- Out of Jurisdiction: The BCI has no legal authority to control internal disciplinary matters of university students or to order universities to conduct an inquiry against their students.
- Defined Rules of Disqualification: A graduate can be barred from enrolling as an advocate only upon conviction in offences involving moral turpitude or under specific statutory provisions; 'ideological dissent' cannot be a ground for cancelling enrolment.
Past Precedents
History of Overreach: This is not the first time that BCI rules have been challenged in the Supreme Court.
- Indian Council of Legal Aid & Advice v. BCI (1995): In this landmark case, the Supreme Court struck down the rule framed by the BCI that attempted to bar individuals above 45 years of age from enrolling as advocates. The court held that the BCI cannot impose new restrictions by going beyond the limits of its statutory powers.
Other Important Points
Chilling Effect: Even though the BCI has withdrawn its directional letters, such steps create a chilling effect among students and future lawyers regarding expressing their views.
- Constitutional Rights: Article 19(1)(a) (Freedom of Speech and Expression) and Article 19(1)(g) (Right to Practice Any Profession or Business) of the Indian Constitution provide this protection to citizens.
Way Forward
Respecting Institutional Autonomy: The BCI should refrain from interfering in the internal affairs of universities and the freedom of expression of students.
- Empathetic Dialogue: The issue between the Chief Justice and the students should be resolved through dialogue, rather than by creating administrative or punitive pressure.
- Balance of Powers: The purpose of legal education is not merely to teach law, but to develop the capacity to question. Regulatory bodies must protect democratic values while adhering to their statutory boundaries.
Conclusion
This case clarifies that the fundamental right to express dissent cannot become the basis for depriving any person of their right to livelihood or profession. Regulatory bodies like the BCI must adhere to the boundaries of their powers and encourage fearless ideological expression among students, rather than creating an atmosphere of fear through punitive measures.